{"id":1059,"date":"2015-04-01T20:07:18","date_gmt":"2015-04-01T20:07:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/naiaonline.org\/blog\/?p=1059"},"modified":"2015-04-01T20:21:43","modified_gmt":"2015-04-01T20:21:43","slug":"placing-dangerous-dogs-undermines-everybody","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/naiaonline.org\/blog\/animal-policy\/placing-dangerous-dogs-undermines-everybody\/","title":{"rendered":"Placing Dangerous Dogs Undermines Everybody"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>From an alarming <a title=\"Complaint: Dangerous dogs being released by city\" href=\"http:\/\/www.abqjournal.com\/562535\/news\/is-city-releasing-dangerous-dogs.html\" target=\"_blank\">article by the\u00a0<em>Albuquerque Journal<\/em><\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: center; padding-left: 20px; padding-right: 20px; font-size: 11.5px;\"><em>In more than 100 cases last year, the Albuquerque Animal Welfare Department has allowed [aggressive]\u00a0dogs to be adopted by families or returned to their owners even though they flunked nationally recognized standardized tests that showed the animals had dangerous tendencies.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center; padding-left: 20px; padding-right: 20px; font-size: 11.5px;\"><em>One dog was so aggressive he couldn\u2019t be tested, but was still adopted out. Some volatile dogs were even taken to the Lucky Paws adoption site in Coronado Center.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center; padding-left: 20px; padding-right: 20px; font-size: 11.5px;\"><em>These are among the explosive allegations in a complaint filed with the city\u2019s Office of Inspector General by the Animal Welfare Department\u2019s second-in-command and its behavior specialist, who said Monday she has resigned out of frustration and alarm for the community.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Go ahead and read the entire article then come back. It&#8217;s important. We&#8217;ll still be here.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1062\" src=\"http:\/\/naiaonline.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/UnfriendlyPup-300x207.jpg\" alt=\"UnfriendlyPup\" width=\"300\" height=\"207\" srcset=\"https:\/\/naiaonline.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/UnfriendlyPup-300x207.jpg 300w, https:\/\/naiaonline.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/04\/UnfriendlyPup.jpg 800w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>&#8212;&#8212;-<\/p>\n<p>We have <a title=\"Mission creep: Dog rescues and animal shelters risk public health and safety\" href=\"http:\/\/www.naiaonline.org\/articles\/article\/Mission-creep-Dog-rescues-and-animal-shelters-risk-public-health-and-safety\" target=\"_blank\">written about mission creep in dog rescue and sheltering<\/a>\u00a0before, and its unintended consequences (disease, dog bites, how it actually enables irresponsible breeding practices, etc.), and this is as prime an example as any.<\/p>\n<p>These allegations are simply stomach churning. When ideology trumps duty like this, it undermines everybody: the public, responsible rescues and shelters, behaviorists and others who work to rehabilitate dogs (done responsibly, many dogs with behavioral problems can be rehabilitated and placed with\u00a0appropriate owners), and of course the dogs themselves. In the end, it always comes back to the dogs. If we had a dollar for every time good intentions untethered from knowledge (or basic reality) ended up hurting the dogs they were meant to save, we&#8217;d have more funding than HSUS&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>So just how on earth is the public going to trust an Animal Welfare\/Animal Services\/Animal Control department if it has a record of adopting out vicious dogs that lunge after children or kill other pets? Dogs that were too aggressive to even <em>take<\/em> behavioral tests?\u00a0Who, exactly, are they looking out for by allowing these dogs to be adopted? Certainly not the people whose communities they are being trusted with!<\/p>\n<p>But they are also doing an incredible disservice to dogs and the rescue community, as well.\u00a0Shelters and rescues have done a great job over the last few decades of marketing themselves as\u00a0<em>the\u00a0<\/em>place to get your next pet. Numbers from one of our recent surveys show that respondents believe\u00a0the healthiest, best-tempered dogs come from rescues or shelters, and list them as first choice among people expecting to acquire dogs in the next 5 years. Do you think these people would be so quick to choose rescues and shelters as their top choice if the first thought that pops into their mind isn&#8217;t &#8220;saving the life of a great\u00a0dog&#8221; but rather &#8220;will the dog we find be safe for the family?&#8221; Is it so\u00a0hard to see how adopting out just a <em>few<\/em>\u00a0aggressive dogs in order to &#8220;save them all,&#8221; or improve euthanasia numbers can hurt the prospects of\u00a0<em>all<\/em> dogs in need of a home?<\/p>\n<p>Anybody who adopts out an aggressive dog is abdicating their responsibility to public safety and undermining literally decades of hard work improving the image of and outcomes for shelter dogs.<\/p>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_content --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_content -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>When ideology trumps duty like this, it undermines everybody: the public, responsible rescues and shelters, behaviorists and others who work to rehabilitate dogs (done responsibly, many dogs with behavioral problems can be rehabilitated and placed with appropriate owners), and of course the dogs themselves.<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on wp_trim_excerpt --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on wp_trim_excerpt --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[3],"tags":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/naiaonline.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1059"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/naiaonline.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/naiaonline.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naiaonline.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naiaonline.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1059"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/naiaonline.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1059\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1064,"href":"https:\/\/naiaonline.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1059\/revisions\/1064"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/naiaonline.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1059"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naiaonline.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1059"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/naiaonline.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1059"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}