Comments on: Indiana Supreme Court Says State Overreached in Dog Seizure

By: MisterCadet

MisterCadet — Thu, 14 Jun 2012 01:13:00 +0000

According to page 59 of HSUS’s 2009 tax returns, a $2,000 grant was given by HSUS to the Office of the Attorney General of Indiana to support the investigation of Indiana puppy mills and placement of puppies…

By: fightacorruptsystem

fightacorruptsystem — Thu, 24 May 2012 08:40:00 +0000

Pro Bono!! The person behind this is the harrison county animal control officer. He currently is being sued by a no kill cat shelter because he raided her too.

By: Alice

Alice — Sat, 19 May 2012 16:42:00 +0000

And these people obviously – and thankfully – had the funds available to get good lawyers to pursue this action – where as most “little” guys – I don’t believe would have been able to do anything financially to pursue this . Thank Goodness they did – now a pecedent is set.

By: Dobegal

Dobegal — Sat, 19 May 2012 15:48:00 +0000

Just let me correct one thing the Indiana State Police didn’t take the dogs, they were only there to assist another state agency, Department of revenue. After going onto the property and seeing what was happening the officers moved to the end of the driveway and wanted nothing to do with the case. Because they were there they get named in the suit. I don’t want anyone to think that the ISP was the strong arm of HSUS here!!!!

By: Laurel

Laurel — Fri, 18 May 2012 04:29:00 +0000

OMG, if either entity isnt illegal and horrible, liars by themself, now they are working as a team, help us all!